- Global Recap
- Posts
- This is totally normal, yes.
This is totally normal, yes.
Hi Global Recap readers,
I’ve been on the lookout for any confirmation of Hezbollah’s new leader, Hashem Safieddine.
Some media reports claim that there is “no way” he could have survived such concentrated attacks by Israel.
Some independent reports suggest that he is definitely “eliminated.”
Some are also claiming that he is not dead, but seriously injured.
Visegrád 24 is now suggesting that Hezbollah has already found a replacement for Hashem Safieddine.
Oh, and there’s also this meme:

Whatever the truth is, we will hopefully get a confirmation soon.
Now, moving onto a rifle-wielding religious leader. 👇
🇮🇷 IRAN
Khamenei Praises October 7 Attack

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei delivered a rare Friday sermon on October 4, defending a recent missile attack on Israel and praising the October 7, 2023, Hamas-led invasion of southern Israel.
He claimed Israel “won’t last long” and hailed the actions of Iran-backed groups as “logical and legal.”
✍️ Note: Do you notice that unusual object slightly to the left of Khamenei? Yeah, that’s a rifle. Totally normal.
Wait… Is he really holding a rifle like that and saying Israel “won’t last long?”

Rare Sermon Delivered
Khamenei addressed tens of thousands in Tehran, marking his first public Friday sermon in nearly five years.
The sermon took place at the Imam Khomeini Grand Mosalla mosque.
Khamenei spoke in Arabic, emphasizing the resilience of the “axis of resistance” against Israel.
He held a rifle during his speech, symbolizing defiance.
The crowd at the sermon were reportedly screaming “death to America” - their favorite slogan.
Praise for October 7 Attack
Khamenei praised the Hamas-led attack on Israel, calling it a justified response.
He described the attack as “logical and legal” under international and Islamic law.
The October 7, 2023, invasion sparked the ongoing conflict in Gaza.
Khamenei claimed the missile barrage was the “minimum punishment” for Israeli actions.
Regional Impact
The sermon highlighted the broader regional implications of the conflict.
Khamenei urged nations from Afghanistan to Yemen to prepare for action against Israel.
He praised the “fierce defense” by Hezbollah, Hamas, and other groups.
The speech followed a commemoration for slain Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah.
Defiance Against Israel
Khamenei asserted that Israel would never defeat the Iran-backed groups.
He declared that the resistance would continue despite recent losses.
Khamenei’s rhetoric aimed to bolster morale among supporters and allies.
The sermon deepened fears of a wider regional war.

🇺🇸 UNITED STATES
US Strikes Houthi Targets

The US military has launched a series of strikes against Houthi targets in Yemen, aiming to protect international waters and navigation.
Recent Houthi Attacks
The Houthis have been actively targeting ships in the Red Sea.
Over 100 ships targeted since last November.
Two ships sunk and one hijacked.
Recent attacks include a drone strike on Tel Aviv and a missile launch in September.
US Response
On Friday, the US conducted airstrikes against 15 Houthi military sites to counter the terrorist’ threats.
They aimed to degrade Houthi offensive capabilities.
Previous strikes have not fully deterred Houthi attacks.
Biden Administration’s Approach
The Biden administration’s approach to dealing with the Houthi rebels has been mostly defensive.
Intercepting drone and missile attacks on commercial vessels and US warships.
Less frequent strikes on Houthi infrastructure to contain fallout from the Israel-Hamas war.
Houthi Capabilities
Despite ongoing strikes, the Houthis maintain significant offensive capabilities.
Retain a robust arsenal, supported by Iran.
Continued ability to launch complex attacks.
Infrastructure strikes have degraded some capabilities but not eliminated the threat.
So, once again, what are US soldiers doing in the Middle East if their role is merely to absorb attacks from nearby terrorist groups?
At this rate, they seem to be nothing more than targets for the Houthis, who occassionally strike back.

🇪🇺 EUROPEAN UNION
Court Rules on Gender Identity

Arian Mirzarafie-Ahi
The European Union’s top court has ruled that member states must recognize legal gender changes made in other EU countries.
This landmark decision has significant implications for transgender individuals across Europe, IF… Romania has anything to say about it.
The Ruling
The Court of Justice of the European Union sided with Arian Mirzarafie-Ahi, a transgender man from Romania.
Romania recently refused to accept his gender identity changes made in Britain.
The court ruled this refusal violated his rights to citizenship and free movement.
The decision emphasizes that gender, like a first name, is a fundamental element of personal identity.
Are we witnessing the gradual disintegration of the EU due to the differing values among its member states?
Implications
This ruling could ease travel and work for transgender people in the EU.
The decision affects tens of thousands of people in similar situations.
It highlights the varying ease of obtaining gender recognition certificates across EU countries.
Some countries allow self-declaration, while others require surgical interventions.
Challenges
Despite the ruling, implementation may face resistance.
Romania has previously resisted similar rulings, such as in the case of same-sex marriage recognition.
The ruling underscores the tension between national sovereignty and EU laws.
Personal Impact
Mirzarafie-Ahi hopes to return to Romania with updated documents.
Mirzarafie-Ahi faced invasive questioning at Romanian borders due to mismatched identity documents.
The ruling allows Mirzarafie-Ahi to assert his identity without such challenges, supposedly.

🇮🇳 INDIA
Marital Rape Debate

India’s Supreme Court is currently hearing petitions to amend a law that prevents the prosecution of marital rape.
What does this Indian government think about this? It opposes these petitions, arguing that criminalizing marital rape would be “excessively harsh.”
Government’s Stance
The government believes existing laws are sufficient to protect married women from sexual violence.
The federal home ministry stated that a man does not have a fundamental right to force sex on his wife.
They argue that criminalizing marital rape could disrupt the institution of marriage.
The ministry suggests that the issue is more social than legal and should be addressed by parliament.
Current Law
The law in question dates back to the British era and exempts marital rape from prosecution.
Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code, established in 1860, includes exemptions for marital rape.
Marital rape is still not criminalized in India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Saudi Arabia.
Campaigners argue that forced sex is rape, regardless of marital status.
Contradictory Judgements
Indian courts have given mixed rulings on the issue.
Some courts have allowed husbands to be tried for rape, while others have dismissed such petitions.
The Supreme Court began hearings on this matter in August following a split verdict from the Delhi High Court in 2022.
Social and Legal Implications
The debate highlights the tension between traditional views and modern human rights standards.
Violence within marriage is rampant, with one in 25 women reporting sexual violence from their husbands.
International organizations like the UN and Amnesty International have criticized India’s stance on marital rape.
The government’s affidavit emphasizes the continuing expectation of sexual access in marriage, which critics say is outdated and harmful.
Thoughts
Yes, it’s true that there are expectations of sexual access in marriage. However, these expectations can be occasionally denied, which can be discussed and agreed upon to determine if they can be fulfilled at a later date.
If these expectations are not met continuously, even though one party seeks it, the marriage may be dissolved.
However, this does not justify one party raping the other.