Vote to Leave Canada

Hi Global Recap readers,

On Christmas Eve 1914, Rifleman Graham Williams of the 5th London Rifle Brigade noticed lights flickering along the German trench line.

  • Then he heard them singing “Stille Nacht, heilige Nacht.”

  • From the British side came a reply: “The First Noel.”

British and German troops meeting in No-Man's Land during the unofficial truce

It wasn’t an isolated pause. In multiple places along the Western Front, spontaneous ceasefires flared up. Some lasted only hours, while a few even stretched into the New Year.

  • The pause let soldiers recover bodies from no man’s land and bury the dead.

  • Men swapped food and small souvenirs from home.

  • However, commanders on both sides tried to shut it down quickly, issuing orders against fraternization and threatening punishment (even court-martial). Before long, the shooting resumed.

This is a famous story of the "1914 Christmas Truce." Reading this story really makes you wonder, “what's all this for?”

🇨🇦 CANADA
Alberta Independence
Question Approved

Putting the Canadian flag upside down is wild…

Elections Alberta has approved a citizen-initiated referendum question that asks voters whether Alberta should become an independent state. If the petition campaign hits the signature target on time, Albertans could be staring down a straight yes-or-no vote on leaving Canada.

  • Question: The approved wording is: "Do you agree that the province of Alberta should cease to be a part of Canada to become an independent state?"

  • Proponent: The push is coming from the Alberta Prosperity Project, led by Mitch Sylvestre, who is also described as a constituency association president for Premier Danielle Smith’s United Conservative Party.

  • Threshold: Sylvestre has until January to appoint a financial officer before he can begin collecting signatures, and then four months to gather just under 178,000. If he meets that threshold, the question will go to a province-wide referendum.

📌 Context: Alberta’s citizen-initiative system lets private groups trigger a referendum if they clear strict administrative steps and collect a required number of verified signatures within a fixed window. This latest approval is only the start of the campaign, not a guarantee the vote will happen.

🇺🇸 UNITED STATES
Visa Bans Hit Europe

Former EU commissioner Thierry Breton, famous for sending this letter to Musk on X.

The U.S. just hit five European figures with entry bans, calling their work on content rules and disinformation enforcement a form of "censorship". The Trump administration announced the move today, framing it as payback for Europe trying to police American speech online.

  • Targets: The list includes

    • former EU commissioner Thierry Breton,

    • Imran Ahmed (Center for Countering Digital Hate),

    • Clare Melford (Global Disinformation Index),

    • two leaders from Germany’s HateAid, Anna-Lena von Hodenberg and Josephine Ballon.

  • Charge: The State Department argues these figures helped push “extraterritorial” pressure on US platforms via Europe’s Digital Services Act, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio blasted what he called a "global censorship-industrial complex."

  • Blowback: Breton hit back within hours of Rubio’s post, in a somewhat teasing tone, stressing that the DSA was democratically adopted.

What Happened?

But here’s a video from 2022 of Musk seemingly agreeing with the DSA. The video shows Musk (left) and Breton (right).

  • Some are calling Musk a hypocrite, only opposed to it now that the law is being applied to him.

  • Others say the law sounds fine on paper, but Musk realized its dystopian nature later, once it was put into practice.

📌 Context: The EU’s Digital Services Act is Europe’s main rulebook for online platforms. It demands more transparency on moderation, ads, and core systems, and requiring action on illegal content and, for the biggest services, “systemic risks.” The U.S., is increasingly treating it as an overseas bid to influence how U.S. platforms police political speech.

🇵🇦 PANAMA
China Wants Majority Control

A $23bn ports buyout centered on the Panama Canal is wobbling after China’s state-owned shipping company COSCO demanded majority control. BlackRock and shipping giant MSC are now weighing whether to walk away from the whole thing.

  • Deal: Hong Kong-based CK Hutchison agreed in March 2025 to sell 43 ports across 23 countries, including two at the Panama Canal, to a consortium led by BlackRock and tied to Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC).

  • Pressure: Beijing has treated the sale as a strategic problem and pushed for it to face China’s merger review process, even though the assets are outside mainland China.

  • Invite: To reduce the political friction, COSCO was brought into talks as a potential partner, with early discussions reportedly centered on a 20-30% stake in CK Hutchison’s non-Panama ports.

  • Demand: However, COSCO is now insisting on a majority stake and negotiators are unsure whether that is a bargaining move or an instruction from Beijing.

  • Risk: If COSCO will not budge, BlackRock and MSC could exit, leaving CK Hutchison with a politically radioactive deal that may hinge on US–China relations cooling in 2026.

📌 Context: The Panama Canal is a critical trade chokepoint, so control of major terminals on either side can quickly become geopolitical. This is why President Trump said that the U.S. should “take back” the canal, citing tolls and warning about Chinese influence.

Trump’s worries may be warranted, since China’s port footprint has been growing globally, often through terminal stakes (like COSCO’s 24.99% holding in HHLA’s Tollerort terminal in Hamburg).